| Ten
Things You Probably Didn't Know About the Energy Office |
| - |
The Energy Office
receives no state funding and no
general funds are used to operate the Energy Office. Since
1992, the entire budget has come from Oil Overcharge funds,
federal grants and/or local partnerships. No state money has
been allocated to the Energy Office in the past decade.
|
| - |
Currently
the Energy Office is managing over $5 million in federal grant
money for various energy related programs and projects. .
In Fiscal Year 2003, the Energy Office was able to secure
$1,093,808 for Arizona projects. |
| - |
The Energy Office publicizes grant availability
and administers grants. Federal Grants awarded this Fiscal
Year being administered by the Energy Office include:
$800,000 to Pinnacle West for Hydrogen Power Park
$75,000 to Tucson USD for Tucson Solar Schools.
$100,000 for Teaching Energy Conservation. (Supports
Implementation of Energy Codes in Tucson Metro Area and
Southern Arizona Communities $25,000 for Tucson Regional
Clean Cities Coordinator
$48,808 to AZ Energy Office
to Film New Solar in Arizona Documentary
$45,000 to Energy Office for State Industries of
the Future Program (IOF) which targets nine industries to
help improve energy efficiency, productivity, and to manage
waste.
|
| - |
The Energy Office also received $650,000
in grants for Fiscal Year 2003 to operate existing state
energy programs. These grants require a 20 percent matching
contributions which is provided by the Oil Overcharge monies.
|
| - |
The
Oil Overcharge Funds are a finite resource and are quickly
running out. Most recently, $8 million was swept from the
Energy Office Oil Overcharge funds during the FY 2003 Special
Session for functions related to the State Schools Facilities
Board. Approximately $4 million remains and a majority of
these funds have been targeted by the legislature to help
offset general fund requirements for the State Schools Facilities
Board budget.
|
| - |
The
Energy Office Municipal Energy Management Program (MEMP) –
Helps more than 80 Arizona Cities, Counties, Tribes and Water
Districts (Under 70,000 Population) to Reduce Energy Costs.
More than $150,000 in matching grants is awarded annually
for projects ranging from lighting retrofits to replacing
boilers and chillers. For every $1 spent in this program,
an average of $2.2 in energy costs is saved annually.
|
| - |
The
Energy Office, in partnership with Arizona utilities and home
building industry members, offered 23 days of training in
FY02 to over 500 attendees from the building trades industry.
Innovations and techniques provided through trainings have
played an integral part in the development, introduction and
extensive use of the Environmental Protection Agency's Energy
Star Program, as well as a number of other market driven programs,
that guarantee a home's heating and cooling costs. The EPA
Energy Star program requires a home must be 30 percent more
efficient than the 1995 Model Energy Code. This equates to
an energy cost savings for homebuyers of $400 a year. Of the
34,000 Energy Star homes built nationally in 2001, there were
over 8,000 constructed in Arizona (Maricopa and Pima Counties).
|
| - |
The
Energy Office was the state's lead agency in the Governor's
Smart Energy Usage Campaign in the summer of 2001 and 2002.
The campaign called upon state agencies to reduce energy usage.
As a result of training and building audits, it is estimated
that the state's conservation efforts reduced energy usage
from 7 to 10 percent and saved the state $115,000 in utility
bills during the summer of 2001 |
| - |
A portion of the
Oil Overcharge monies administered by the Department of Commerce
go to a Revolving Energy Loans for Arizona (RELA) program.
Loans are available to companies that either manufacture renewable
energy, alternative energy, or energy conserving equipment
or acquire such equipment for use in their own processes.
In the past, loans have been made to help expand an Arizona
wind turbine manufacturer and a solar collector manufacturer.
|
| - |
The
Energy Office has conducted projects in every county in the
state. Current efforts include performing audits and weatherization
training in the Ak Chin Community.
|
| |
To contact your state legislator
click here.
To contact the
Governor, click here.
|
|
|
The Arizona Energy Office serves a vital role in the state's commitment
to energy efficiency and renewable energy. However, the programs that
encourage energy efficiency and renewable-energy usage and help reduce
utility costs for Arizona schools, businesses and citizens may become
victim to the state's fiscal crisis.
The
legislature is currently considering a proposal that may result in
elimination of most of the programs administered by the Energy Office.
Although the Energy Office receives no state funding,
the proposal sweeps 97 percent of the Energy Office's remaining federal
oil overcharge monies into the general fund for the State School's
Facilities Board budget. The proposed Legislative sweep will jeopardize
the state's access to new federal and partnership funding opportunities,
force the Energy Office to reduce staff by two-thirds and eliminate
most of its existing energy programs.
If the Arizona Energy Office loses its funding, it will send
the message that Arizona is not serious about energy issues.
To contact your state legislator
click here.
To contact the
Governor, click here.

Solar Project at Gray Wolf Landfill was partially funded
by Special Project Grant in partnership with APS.

Solar Pond Aerators at the Somerton Wastewater Plant were funded
with a Municipal Energy Management Grant.

The Tucson Solar Schools Project received major support from
a Special Project Grant administered by the Energy Office.
|
Because the State provides no general
funds to the Energy Office, the Oil Overcharge Funds are the main source
of funds available to the Energy Office for programs and match for federal
special project grants. The Energy Office operates ongoing programs
for energy conservation in municipal governments, low-income weatherization,
solar energy, and a building education program aimed at the construction
trades. In the past, Oil Overcharge monies have been used as match to
obtain special grants to fund a series of solar design and installation
workshops, perform energy audits in state buildings, conduct code training
workshops, operate a solar education program targeting homeowner associations,
and provide partial funding for the design and installation of a mini-grid
photovoltaic system at Gray Wolf Landfill in Yavapai County.
How
Can You Help?
How can I help? Call or email your Legislator
and the Governor
to voice your concerns about using the Oil Overcharge money to offset
the deficit in the general fund.
The Oil Overcharge money is essential to the operation
of an effective and productive energy program for the State of Arizona.
The purposed sweep of Oil Overcharge funds by the legislature will cripple
the Energy Office. Not only will this sweep affect the State's ability
to bring in federal money for energy related programs and projects,
but without the Oil Overcharge monies the following programs will be
severely impacted or eliminated:
- Weatherization Program Reduced
- No Municipal Energy Management Program for Small
Communities
- No Energy Policy Function
- No Funding for Energy-Efficient Schools
- No Solar Information and Education Program
- No Funds For Energy Codes Training
- No RELA loan funds
- No Funds For Boards and Commissions (Solar Energy
Advisory Council and Energy Codes Commission)
- No Participation at Western Interstate Energy Board
(WGA affiliate)
What message would this send to Arizonans and others:
That Arizona Is Not Serious About Energy Issues.
A decision to eliminate the major functions of the Energy
Office could jeopardize other potential federal investments in Arizona.
By sweeping the Oil Overcharge monies into non-energy programs, it would
jeopardize the state's ability to attract federal grants. The elimination
of programs would result in igher energy costs for schools, and state
and municipal governments throughout the state.
Facts and Info to Consider:
- Elimination of this resource
at a time when energy consumption, costs, security, supplies, and
knowledge about energy savings are paramount to attracting new businesses
and retaining existing businesses -- does not make good business sense.
- Successful economic preservation as well as development
is critically dependent on adequate, affordable, and secure energy
supplies.
- A reduction in the functions of the Energy Office
would deprive municipalities, school districts, businesses, universities,
and communities throughout the state the opportunity to obtain assistance
needed to identify, review and perform technical analysis of energy
saving projects and grant opportunities.
- The legislative proposal would affect Arizona's position
to participate in energy issues and policies affecting western states.
- At a time when energy issues have become extremely
crucial to everyone, this severe reduction diminishes the Energy Office's
ability to operate, and would force it to abandon many of its constitutents
and partners who have joined with the office to assure that Arizona
has adequate and affordable energy resources for the future.
Oil Overcharge Background:
The Oil Overcharge funds resulted from a federal lawsuit
against major oil companies. The oil companies were ordered to pay into
an escrow account that the federal government distributed to or for
the benefit of injured parties in the United States, which included
motor vehicle operators, electric utility customers, home heating oil
customers, and other end-users of petroleum products.
Pursuant to the guidelines established by the Department
of Energy and the decisions of the federal courts, the Governor of Arizona
is responsible for the allocation of these funds in Arizona. Each court
case (primarily the Exxon, Stripper Well and Diamond Shamrock cases)
and those that were settled through administrative hearings at Department
of Energy's Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) have settlements with
different strings attached.
Several general rules state that primary program outcomes
must be energy conservation or other energy-related benefits. In general,
restitution must be linked to the aggrieved consumer, benefits must
supplement, not supplant, existing sources of funds. Federal approval
and reporting are required.
Exxon oil overcharge funds are required to be spent
in five federal energy conservation programs. No administrative expenses
are allowed, and they may not supplant either state or federal funding.
These five programs are: state energy conservation program, energy extension
service, institutional conservation program, low income weatherization
and low income home energy assistance program. They may not be used
for capital expenditures for state government, except in the form of
a loan for energy conservation items that may be repaid out of energy
savings.
Stripper Well funds are less restrictive and may be
used in broader energy-related programs, including administrative expenses
and partially allowable legal expenses. Diamond Shamrock funds follow
restrictions similar to Stripper Well funds, except that legal fees
are allowable expenses. The types of projects under these two funds
generally can be categorized as transportation (like the fuel efficient
traffic signal programs, highway traffic management program, car clinics
and vehicle fleet maintenance programs), residential i.e., weatherization,
retrofitting, tune-ups and energy audits and commercial i.e., energy
loans, audits and cogeneration.
|